Resor
comments 22

Gotland, a sustainable travel destination or not?.

I decided (at this moment) to write something about Gotland and if it is a great place traveling in the view of someone who wants to travel sustainable. The answer is yes, but lets talk about it a little.

At the moment me and my mother is in the hotel, drinking the cheapest wine we could find (since we barely can afford to eat due to the expensive place of Gotland). This is of course a negative thing, both from a traveler perspective but also in the eyes of the sustainable traveler. Going to Gotland you can go by ferry, which is a more sustainable alternative than traveling by airplane. I think that all, well, maybe all agree on this.

But being so expensive, that is when something happens. ”And what is that”, you might ask yourself. Well yes, a big group of people can´t afford to travel to Gotland anymore and will then chose the more cheaper alternative of the low price flights and the high cost of environmental degredation.

To sum up a little about Gotland there is both positives and negatives. The positives are so great that they overshadow the negative but it is still important to put it all in perspective.

The town is medieval and preserved. Me and my mother live in a 13th century hotel (say what?!). Yes, you heard me. We live in a hotel, where the building was built in the 13th century. The original paintings of the hanseatic town of Lubeck and the town of Riga is on level one of the hotel. How cool is that? History is interesting and of course good to preserve, but by preservation you also to some extent stay environmental friendly and not since you don´t rebuild all the time but on the other side, risk having buildings that leak energy. I go for the first alternative here by the logic of having a building for a long time will save the cost of rebuilding (but here I am probably wrong).

But Gotland as a whole then? Well, the island is surrounded by water, the Baltic sea (will get back to that), transports is tricky since there is not much people on the countryside. Me and my mom chose to have the car, or mum chose and I tagged along. It is my car but I don´t have much say in it since my mother doesn´t want to go by bike. I want, she refused. Without a lazy mother, you can of course travel around the island by bike. It is wonderful paths for bikes everywhere and the island is bike friendly. At least it says that it is.

The Baltic sea then. Oh the Baltic, it is beautiful, but it had its fair share of environmental problems. Algal and mush, is to be found in the beaches. Don´t know if they have problems with poison algal blooming here, but there have been in Sweden due to the state of the Baltic due to agriculture and industrial pollution causing death of the bottom of the sea and creating extensive algal blooms. The Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Litany, Poland, German, Denmark, Sweden and Finland, Åland (and a small part of Russia, have I forgot some?) share the Baltic. Need I say more about the big pressure the Baltic copes with?

The hotel we live in try to be environmental friendly I think. I say think since I don´t have much more evidence then schampoo bottles labeled ”eco” something. Turning the bottle it is the same shit as always, so don´t really understand why it´s named Eco or if it even is Eco. And why name something Eco that only have products that aren´t grown anyway? In what way is that organic and what is ment by eco? The make-up business baffles me, as always. Don´t get me starting on titanium dioxide. It was on the news today that it is cancerogenic. I think like a big part of environmental friendly alternative make-up has this. But back to the hotel, well. They try, as I said. They have basically all products possible on the breakfast table labeled Sustainable/ ekologisk. But if this is the choice of this hotel or if it is the clarion group that chose this I do not know. I also wonder if they actually put some real effort in this or if it only is the things that is showing that to same extent is the friendlier alternative..

A big plus is all the windmill. The strong wind of the north cuts into the bones of the traveller but benefits the buisness of windmills, which sets I nice tone to the environment and make you feel happy when passin them knowing that Gotland has good and green electricity.

To sum up Gotland I would say that the environmental benefits is bigger than the negative ones, but that the biggest problem might be the rising prices of everything on Gotland making it impossible for some groups to travel here. I think the overload of old Swedish people on the ferry prove my point, even though I didn´t caught them on photo but also what a lady on Fårö told me that there only is about 300 households on Fårö that are permanent residents and when the kids leave, they probably never return since they can´t afford to live on their own island.

Please look at the pictures and comment on my reasoning. I can take critique and like when people debate the subject of the greening of the urban environment. Write in Swedish or whatever language you prefer. 

Katarina

All photos taken with Canon 5D, 50 mm Canon lens f 1,8, edited in Lightroom.

HH7A4997

A common flower on Gotland that apparently love the limestone ground of the island.

HH7A5011

Does this look natural to you?

HH7A5012

Algal blooming or seaweed?

HH7A5031

The sea reclaimed a swan, leaving only a wing on the beach.

HH7A5034

A dramatic closeup of the fragile life of birds. On Gotland there is many nature reserves that have a richness in birdlife and the islands of Stora Karlsö and Lilla Karlsö is an ”paradise” for them.

HH7A5040

The islands of Lilla and Stora Karlsö.

HH7A5043-2

The Baltic.

HH7A5047

The Baltic.

 

 

22 Comments

    • haha jo precis. En hel svanvinge. Hur ofta ser man det? Mamma hittade den och bara. Hmm, jag tror det är en svan som mött ett tragiskt öde där bort och det vara måste man ju dokumentera som fotograf. Det sköra i livet..

  1. Are your photos different from the way you normally upload them ? – they’re taking so long to resolve that I shall have to come back at a time when fewer people are on-line.

      • I got to see them without problem now. This is the first time I’ve had my downloads affected by volume of usage – and I’m not happy about it. I shall complain to my ISP.

  2. Such a lot of things to respond to, Katarina !! … ”Does this look natural to you ?” would depend upon where it is: I mean, is it close to the sea. or nowhere near it ? (1) Yes; (2) No.
    I love you having a go at your mother in hopes that she will read this ! 😀 You even put your complain in bold type, just to make sure !!! I think you and your mum get on very well.
    Hotels are always going to supply the cheapest thing they can get away with and pretend it’s quality; and similiarly something that is not what they pretend it is. They think all visitors are idiots, and want nothing but their money. It’s sad that prices have risen like that; but any place where the cost of everything is sky-high, you can bet quality goes out the window …
    One thing I note immediately is that there’s no garbage anywhere – that’s terrific ! And also amazing, imnsho … I mean, I know the Swedish people don’t chuck rubbish around, but tourists usually do …

    • Well. Yes it is natural but in the Baltic there is a lot of agriculture leakage why there is more algal thingies in. 2. There is no trash in Sweden basically 3. It is a very expensive hotel 4. I love this island and will go back for the medieval week sometime

Kommentera

E-postadressen publiceras inte. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *